I found myself being guilty of something that irritates the crapola out of me when I see it other places: Bandwagon behavior. I'm not proud of it and it got me thinking about one of the main sources of my current-event files and entertainment, i.e. social media. And my DILEMA, in meme form is this:
It all started for me with the now-internet sensation #MakingAMurderer. I was not aware of any crazy rabidity surrounding this Netflix show when I first watched it, thinking only that I, like many people, have morbid curiosity that real life murder shows somehow soothe. In other words, we're a bunch of harmless looky-loos. I watched this show about a man who had been wrongfully convicted of rape and was given another shot at life once his sentence was vacated- after serving 18 years- only to be arrested for murder in the handful of months that followed.
This one still works actually- and still makes me laugh |
Classic |
And the fact is... I was wrong. Or at least not in possession of the full set of facts. I<3 Radio has put out a collection of 10 minute rebuttals for each episode of the series- and without ruining the show or the radio piece for you I will say that both sides are as wildly speculative and subjective as the other. One has a bit more evidence... but the bottom line is at least listening pushed me out of the auto-pilot indignation cloud back into rational thoughts of my own.
Not only was I wrong, but I had fanned flames and contributed to what is becoming a national outcry.... that is having real life impact on the people who actually lived through this case and trial. The family of the girl who died, the public officials who bungled everything from start to finish, and the skeevy pervert prosecutor who ultimately won the day. Yes that sounded harsh, watch the show- it's fair. The point is they are still people despite how awful they come across. So in the immortal words of Jane Austen's Mr. Darcy, "[I] have now only to be ashamed of what my own [feelings] have been."
Normally, in situations of widespread, often uneducated outrage- if I weigh in at all, I try to stay neutral. Many of us may have forgotten Cecil the Lion by now, but that was once such instance. The Facebook/Twitter/Social Media nation called for the lion killer's head on a platter- and while I categorically disapprove of his actions, I found it telling that people in Zimbabwe had a different message:
"In Zimbabwe, we don't mourn for lions..."
So how do so many of us mostly intelligent, usually rational and civilized people keep getting caught up in the online mob mentality? The trouble is that social media has fostered and nurtured a phenomenon called SLACKTIVISM
slack·tiv·ism
ˈslaktəˌvizəm/
noun
informal
actions performed via the Internet in support of a political or social cause but regarded as requiring little time or involvement, e.g., signing an online petition or joining a campaign group on a social media website.
"such e-mail alerts make slacktivism easy"
informal
actions performed via the Internet in support of a political or social cause but regarded as requiring little time or involvement, e.g., signing an online petition or joining a campaign group on a social media website.
"such e-mail alerts make slacktivism easy"
From changing the philters on our Facebook pictures to spreading the dreaded online petition- while it is nice to show compassion and solidarity- realize, that is all it amounts to. This is not ACTIVISM.
The term activism is self-evident in that it requires action- which the click of a mouse does not constitute. Do online petitions highlight the distant plight of nameless unfortunates and tug on your heart strings? Without a doubt. Do they actually work? Not at all. If there is cause you believe in- or even if there is something that is circulating online, you are better off doing your own research rather than mindlessly forwarding it on to you equally unsuspecting friends. If the research proves sound, but your schedule doesn't allow for an active role- DONATE.
On a smaller scale, bandwagon shenanigans will abound as we roll into Super Bowl madness. That can be forgiven as people want to feel included even if their favorite team has already been knocked out of the playoffs. Sports fans will tell you otherwise, but at times like this it doesn't do to be a purist or have a long memory. Even if it's not my team per se, I'm still bound to have an opinion or at least preference in the arena. And this is one positive expression of group mentality- sharing in the cheering and excitement.
Where the real problem with banding together comes is when it is morphs into cyberbullying or social shaming. In the unfortunate case of the murder show- those people were highlighted nationally and will be on the radar until the wind blows someone else under the microscope.
The danger of getting in on it is that it is all too easy to forget the real people that read the comments posted from the safety of relative anonymity. Additionally, the fickle attention span of social media makes it easy to drop a blitzkrieg of abuse on someone and then forget on the way to the next fad- leaving that person behind to deal with the implications.
Before jumping on the wagon or weighing in on a topic really think about if it is something you:
A. Care about- if so why?
Weighing in if you don't care will give the exact opposite impression. Be judicious about what you throw your name behind.
B. Know anything about- what makes your input worthwhile?
An old saying comes to mind- "it's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it.
C. Does your voice add anything positive to the debate?
This is really more subjective- but for me I find that I try to avoid spreading negativity. Education- yes, if I'm qualified, but negative conjecture, I try to steer clear or.... because what's the point and who does it help?
The thing about opinions and outrage is there is never a shortage of either, but that doesn't make them right.